2014 Impala.....what do you guys think? - Page 7 - Chevrolet Impala SS Forum : Chevy Impala SS Forums
Impala SS Forum
Go Back   Chevrolet Impala SS Forum : Chevy Impala SS Forums > General Topics > Misc.
New User? Register - Forgot Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 04-04-2012, 09:32 PM
jose7740's Avatar
jose7740 jose7740 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: colorado springs
Posts: 72
jose7740 is on a distinguished road
Default

From the side and back it looks like the Sonata and since Hyundai led the charge to put only four cylinders on the Sonata, everybody followed and the Impala is no exception. GM sold a lot of Impalas most to rental fleets so they do not care about making a performance version of the car and then you have NASCAR so it has the aerodynamics neede for racing the circuit, we could get what we want if we all write to GM, maybe they will listen.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #62  
Old 04-04-2012, 10:26 PM
ghetto wagon's Avatar
ghetto wagon ghetto wagon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cooba
Posts: 10,676
ghetto wagon is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I like my 2001 model better.
__________________


1995 Calypso Green Impala ss. Now with a BBB vinyl wrap
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 04-04-2012, 11:02 PM
impala_lover's Avatar
impala_lover impala_lover is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Pontiac,MI
Posts: 73
impala_lover is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to impala_lover
Default 2014 Impala

Sometimes pictures are not enough. Really would like to see this car up close.
__________________
Janet: MISSL President http://www.missl.org
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 04-04-2012, 11:27 PM
1994 SS 1994 SS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Other side of the pacific
Posts: 830
1994 SS
Default

It's an improvement over the previous Wimpala, but I'm not in love with it. It just proves good design isn't easy and great design is very difficult. In all honesty I'm not a fan of the chunky look of most new cars. It might fit the current taste of the masses, but it looks too much like a Camry or Hyundai to me. I know people will say it's safety standards and aerodynamics that dictate the high belt-lines, small windows and rounded chunky look, but you just have to look at high end cars from Bentley and Maserati to see good looking designs with a lot of presence and character can still be achieved. When I bought my Impala SS it was because it was positioned as a performance orientated sedan with more aggressive styling cues. Not another mundane, lost in the crowd family cruiser. So I guess I'm probably not the target demographic for this new Impala anyway. It will be interesting to see if a version is released in SS trim with a bigger engine and AWD or even (dare I say it) RWD. But I wish the Chevrolet designers would break away from the "Camry esque" styling. It's interesting, brands like Aston Martin, Bentley, Rolls Royce, Bugatti and Maserati can create contemporary designs that are modern and still look very European, but Chevy comes up with Impalas that look more Asian than American. We already have companies in Asia producing cars like the Camry, so I really hoped to see an Impala that made a bolder statement as a purely American car with some guts.

Who knows what my next purchase will be. It might be something European or an American classic just to get something with a little more character.

That said, the new Impala is better looking than I thought it would be, just not for me in its current FWD form (but we already knew that.)

Last edited by 1994 SS; 04-05-2012 at 01:47 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 04-05-2012, 12:17 AM
Steve H's Avatar
Steve H Steve H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Beavercreek OH
Posts: 456
Steve H
Thumbs down

It Sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let's see the rear looks like a Hyundai Sonata, the sides look like a Buick Lacross, and the front-end looks like a Chevy Traverse. All-in-all it looks like a bloated Malibu!! The only silver lining is that the interior is semi-decent.

Other than that (IMHO) it is a 4000 pound FWD land-barge POS that will sticker at $40K, powered by a 4 cly standard -- which should make the community organizer and current administration happy.

Yey!!!!!
__________________
96 Impala SS: AI package. Rear Wheel power = 352 HP (422 HP @ Fly Wheel), Rear Wheel torque = 330 FtLb (396 FtLb @ Fly Wheel).
95 Caprice Wagon: Usual Mods
94 RMW: 1.6 RRs, 915s, K&N FIPK, TB Bypass Air foil, Borla, 160 stat, BH tune, Denny DS, w/3.73 gears
11 Caprice 9C3: Stock
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 04-05-2012, 01:30 AM
mrmarkuSS's Avatar
mrmarkuSS mrmarkuSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 2,524
mrmarkuSS is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badass94Cad View Post
Autoweek
Where is the Chevrolet Impala SS?
By: Greg Migliore on 4/04/2012


"The best Impala designs had an essence that is easy recognizable," said John Cafaro, Chevrolet director of exterior design.

With pending CAFE regulations that will raise fuel-efficiency requirements, an SS version might not be realistic for the Impala. Reuss said the bar is high for any Chevy that would get that badge. The SS would have to be a "home run," he said.

"We're not going to do it on every product," Reuss said. "It's got to be very special."

Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...#ixzz1r5wh46dt
They need to get a damn clue and make one RETRO. They want to sell cars,they need to wake the f up and build one,THEN they'll see sales jump.
__________________

95 9C1 Impala SS clone(mine),
95 SS BBB(wife's)-awaiting a transmission,then going up for sale,
08 Impala LS-wife's new DD.
2013 LISST PRESIDENT
ISSCA #2134(Renew pending...when I feel like doing it finally.Just to satisfy the brown nosers.)
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 04-05-2012, 01:40 AM
JeffersonState's Avatar
JeffersonState JeffersonState is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Medford, OR
Posts: 92
JeffersonState is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monsta Mayne View Post
for what it is.....i think its cool. the design is a hell of alot better than the past 2 generations...

I dont know why you guys were ever expecting GM to just switch up the direction of the Impala...with RWD and a badass motor, times have changed.



http://youtu.be/YnFO9oSYFb8
The "inspiring" music is the best part of the video. That and more than half of it is animated.
__________________
1995 Caprice Classic
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 04-05-2012, 03:08 AM
Knaagi_II Knaagi_II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 554
Knaagi_II
Default

Why arenīt they using the Cadillac CTS platform and giving us an affordable RWD performance sedan that deserves the Impala name?
__________________
91 Caprice 9C1 (Olds 403ci, Edelbrock Heads&Intake, 750cfm QuickFuel Carb, 3000rpm Converter, TCI TH350, 3.42:1, Eaton Posi, Bilsteins)
91 Olds Custom Cruiser (AIR delete, 3" SEO Y-Pipe, Dynomax Muffler, Bilsteins)
96 9C1 (CIA Tri-Ys & Cats, Aluminum Heads, Speed-Tech Tubular CAs, Pro Magnum RRs & Dual Springs, Dynomax Cat-back, PCMForless)
92 Mercedes S500
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 04-05-2012, 07:26 AM
Navy Lifer's Avatar
Navy Lifer Navy Lifer is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canton GA
Posts: 5,645
Navy Lifer is an unknown quantity at this point
Default AWD? Buy the Buick

Here's the initial "official" response to those asking why AWD isn't going to be offered on the 2014 Impala--but is offered (already) on Buick Lacrosse and will be offered on Cad XTS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knaagi_II View Post
Why arenīt they using the Cadillac CTS platform and giving us an affordable RWD performance sedan that deserves the Impala name?
Just a guess--it has as much to do with production facility capacity, and cost of re-configuring existing production lines to build the RWD vehicle in larger numbers that would occur with an Impala vs CTS. Not sure what the EPA classification of Impala vs CTS may be--based on interior volume. The CTS has a longer wheelbase, so it's a fair question. The actual build cost of CTS may be greater, and I suspect CTS fuel economy may be a few clicks lower than the Impala's.
__________________
Bill Harper
ISSCA #127
inov8r@windstream.net
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 04-05-2012, 08:03 AM
Big Kahuna's Avatar
Big Kahuna Big Kahuna is offline
ISSF Honey Badger
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 25,159
Big Kahuna is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Big Kahuna
Default

Retro? Different platform? More drivetrains? Different styling? Would you all buy one then?

99% of the critics in this thread either won't buy or can't afford a new Impala anyway.

GM tries to build what the paying customers want, not what a bunch of tire kicking stuck in the 90's cheap bastards on a 16+ year old car forum claim they should do.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
(c) 2007-2011 Impala SS Forum