| ||||
|
New User? Register - Forgot Password | ||||||
| Register | Garage | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | vBClassified | Googlemap ME | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's a question on ignition timing. Long story short, I've been working for a while on working out the kinks on an engine overhaul, and I just about have it all sorted. It's a built-up 350 with a Crane 227 cam, completely reworked heads, headers, intake, etc. The most fundamental issue has been fuel efficiency - running at about 12-15MPG under all circumstances. The breakthrough came with replacement of the opti vent harness, which was mucking up the opti (among other things). Obviously I replaced the opti at the same time. Since then, it now reads consistently 15-24 MPG (streets vs highway).
The one remaining "issue" is ignition timing. My scanner reports it consistently negative, by about -30 to -50. The question is, is that even a real issue, or is it just a programming thing? I'm not an expert on tuning, so I just installed a mail-order tuned computer from Bryan Herter. But, as I understand it, the computer programming has some sort of baseline setting for ignition timing, and is pulling the timing back because the baseline setting is too high. Is that right? Would it not be possible to just reprogram it with a lower setting for ignition timing? Everything else on the car seems to be running great.
__________________
Faster than a tall building. Able to leap speeding bullets in a single bound. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
theres no way the engine would even run at 30+ degrees retarded timing so I doubt thats an accurate reading of actual timing.
in fact, when at cruise and all the relevant parameters are met, egr is commanded on and ignition timing is advanced from what I remember. other variables are the knock sensors and what octane did you get a tune for? did you make sure you didnt overtighten the knock sensors?
__________________
evil T-47 seatbelt bolts and cutdown ZQ8 bumpstops, Kore3 front brakes, TB bypass, Dynotech DS, F-body EGR, Meziere WP, Comp Cams 1.6RR/CM springs, trans by Moi Industries, Yank 3600, Earls trans cooler/rad cooler delete/Derale t-stat, RAISS, SLP headers, SLP injectors, pypes X-pipe/magnaflows, Borgeson shaft, Hotchkis springs, PPM front stuff, Metco rear arms, Clear Image DS loop/trans crossmember, 3.73s, eaton posi, Hypertech for smog BH tuned PCM
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
and thinking some more, if mileage is good and it is running fine with no issues I'd say leave it alone.
just make sure it aint pinging/knocking when you floor it with yor brown shoes
__________________
evil T-47 seatbelt bolts and cutdown ZQ8 bumpstops, Kore3 front brakes, TB bypass, Dynotech DS, F-body EGR, Meziere WP, Comp Cams 1.6RR/CM springs, trans by Moi Industries, Yank 3600, Earls trans cooler/rad cooler delete/Derale t-stat, RAISS, SLP headers, SLP injectors, pypes X-pipe/magnaflows, Borgeson shaft, Hotchkis springs, PPM front stuff, Metco rear arms, Clear Image DS loop/trans crossmember, 3.73s, eaton posi, Hypertech for smog BH tuned PCM
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I suspected knock retard at first too, so I scanned specifically for that. Knock sensors check out fine, and no knock was ever detected. Certainly no audible knock either. I guess I should just leave well enough alone.
__________________
Faster than a tall building. Able to leap speeding bullets in a single bound. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The spark advance timing numbers come up with a negative sign for positive spark advance. I guess you can think for it as moving the spark BACK in the timing of events, so its negative. Either way, if it ain't broke.....
__________________
96 Impala SS Daily Driver, LT4 cam, 1.65 roller rockers, cleaned up iron heads, 26lb injectors, export pipes, Lowes cold air intake, oil cooler, PCMforLess tune |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|