| ||||
|
New User? Register - Forgot Password | ||||||
| Register | Garage | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | vBClassified | Googlemap ME | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
However my comment was in regards to and LS engine being less dependable than an LT. its like the local hillbillies down here that say carbs are the best and EFI is junk. i turn into steve buscemi in fargo yelling "I'm not going to debate with you!" its nonsense
__________________
1996 Impala SS - DCM - LS swap in progress... 2006 Trailblazer SS - 402ci LS2, RWD 4L80 swap |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
My Impala is apples to apples too. Both are 5.7ltr, t56 cars with 3.73's. with 285 tires out back. ah chit. Ive got 275's out back of the cadi The cadi will never almost lift the drivers side front on a redline powershift from 1st to 2nd like my SS will. I know the ls motors are suppose to be so great but I dont see the hype in them over replacing the LT. Unless your going for crazy HP Just build a mean lt1 and enjoy it
__________________
96 sob 17,xxx stolen 96 sob t-56'ed 69,xxx totaled 96DGGM DD T-56'ed 05 CTS-V 48,xxx Issca #2324 T-56,845 cam, JPR f-body heads, 1.6 rr, 58mm tb, SSRI, FLP LT , High flow cats, CIA 3" cat-back, 21" Aerochambers, Dennys DS, 3.73's, Eaton posi, Currie upr & lwr cntrl arms, HA rear bar, F-body front bar, QA1's 6 way frnts, Bilstein 0929 rear, Hotchkis springs, MB OS 17"x 9.5"[SIGPIC] Last edited by GreenHornet; 01-16-2013 at 09:35 PM. Reason: tire size |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quentin-1995 Impala SS-6.0L LQ4-222/226-L92 Heads.PB: 1.75 60ft 12.70 @ 107.75 so far
![]() |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know what your saying GA95DCMSS
Im kinda scared to shatter the irs diff, so i dont abuse first all that much.I love both cars for different reasons. Ive seen you on the other forums. Im Shadowstalker on cadiforums and tpagreenhornet on ls1tech. maybe ill hit you up for that fast intake if i ever send my heads out to tea. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sorry. Sent from my DROID BIONIC using AutoGuide.Com Free App
__________________
Michael -1979 Caprice 6.0 - 11.78@115.3 NSHS2 - March 30th 2013, Cecil County Dragway
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Dependability....well again that all depends on how well the conversion is done. On average, leaving it as close to factory as possible is going to work out best for you.
__________________
Stock bottom, AI topend Built by B-Body Performance NA: 10.98 @ 122 100 shot: 10.35 @ 128 2012 ISSCA Nationals SSuperPro Champion |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() I just think that if you are going to start pouring money into making power , start with the better design. If all you are looking at is to get to 350/350 hp/torque you can certainly get there cheaper with the LT1. What about 400/400? What about 450HP? I'm making well over that with a smaller cam than an equivalent(ish) LT4 hot cam in my iron 6.0. On carburetor. What about 500hp and 7000rpm? What kind of aftermarket parts do you have to start throwing at an LT1 to get there? Lets start this way. Given similar displacements, which engine family makes more stock hp/cubic inch. Stock 5.7L lt1-260 hp.. I'll tikt the scales and say stock LT1 corvette even though it starts at aluminum heads and say 300 hp is the lt1 baseline. LS1 345 HP. Toss a stock cam and better heads on both. Make your LT1 an LT4. 330,HP. Stock heads and cam and LS1 and make it an LS6. It's just heads cam and intake like the LT1-4... but the LS6 makes 405HP. Stronger block, better oil pump, less leak prone seals, better valve angle, better valvetrain parts, stronger crank, better rods, taller deck, better intake, better ecm/pcm. Pat.... if you started all over again, would you build an LT or an LS? I'm on a mission to make the LS conversion less costly, less daunting. It's not as scary as you think. Sent from my DROID BIONIC using AutoGuide.Com Free App
__________________
Michael -1979 Caprice 6.0 - 11.78@115.3 NSHS2 - March 30th 2013, Cecil County Dragway
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Michael,
If there's some rule limiting me to stock GM parts, then sure I'll stuff a late model 400 hp LS engine into it. If I had to do it over again? ...No hesitation whatsoever; I'd stay LT1. For no conversion hassles, I have 525 hp on the cheap. What kind of aftermarket parts? .......just heads, cam, and ARP rod bolts. Now if you're at the mercy of someone who doesn't know how to rebuild an engine properly, then yes, you have a point--just rely on an engine that GM put together with the power you require...ie. LS. You either pay more for a later model that has the power, or you swap cams and upgrade the valvetrain in an earlier one to get the power to make the conversion worthwhile. I still see the LS conversion as a "uniqueness" attraction for most. Unless they're guys like you and Gerry who can do it and dial it in themselves, most will get in over their head and have unimpressive results. Don't get me wrong, I love seeing the different routes people take with their cars. It's why this hobby is so interesting compared to all the racing series that outlaw ingenuity. But, when somebody asks me what's the best power per dollar route, depending on the resources and skills they have, I'm likely to be a realist and tell them to stick with the platform that their car came with
__________________
Stock bottom, AI topend Built by B-Body Performance NA: 10.98 @ 122 100 shot: 10.35 @ 128 2012 ISSCA Nationals SSuperPro Champion |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|