|
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Calendar | vBClassified | Googlemap ME | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's a superchevy article with a ZEX dry kit, on a 1996 Caprice. They also explained why they chose using a DRY kit over a WET kit.
http://superchevy.automotive.com/658...kit/index.html
__________________
1995 9c1 Performance Mods: K&N Gen II Intake, TransGo Shift Kit, Exhaust... Misc Mods: Autometer Guages, Harness Bar, 5 point harness -Put Up, Or Shut Up- |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
awesome.. this will be my christmas present to myself.
__________________
![]() 1995 RMW, K&N FIPK2, Thrush Weldeds, Cragar Soft 8's.. ...soon to be geared and juiced. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
that they didn't even discuss the merits of the wet kit or even one other manufacturer makes me wonder how much advertising holley brands does with the magazine.
__________________
rock on, rus Quote:
11/08/08 SSHS8 / 4403 lb.s Hotlanta Dragway |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On an older car like ours, using a wet nitrous system that injects both gasoline and nitrous simultaneously into the intake manifold can prove to be dicey. This is because all the fuel being injected can sit in the manifold and cylinder head's ports and get absorbed into the oil sludge and carbon buildup like a sponge, making it a bomb in the event of a slight backfire. All that fuel wants to combust, and it will rip apart expensive hard parts in the process. Therefore, a dry kit is the safer, more preferred choice for our Killer Whale.
Guess they said older cars with lots of sludge in the intake is the main reason they didn't go wet.
__________________
Friends don't let friends go un-modded. Bob Wilkinson |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dry has its advantages and disadvantages....Wet has its advantages and its disadvatages, both systems work if done properly and the engine..especially the bottom end is healthy, both kits yied similar results up to about 125 hp shot...anything after that..a wet system would most likely be better...I have had both on my car..Dry kit for about 6 months and a wet system for the next 5 years after that.
Take a look at the ET page...see how many cars (fast ones) are running dry kits..to how many are running wet kits...that magazine is NOT your friend the issue has been chewed on in detail several times..a lot of that info is now gone..but take a look at the ET page...see which cars have nitrous on them that have similar mods that you have...and see which type of kits they are running...you probably wont see very many dry kits being used. Peace
__________________
![]() One NaSSty Black a.s.s car Last edited by Rod HarriSS : 09-30-2009 at 09:07 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() 1995 RMW, K&N FIPK2, Thrush Weldeds, Cragar Soft 8's.. ...soon to be geared and juiced. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() One NaSSty Black a.s.s car |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
i dunno if that was sarcasm, haha. that setup you have looks nasty! anymore pics of it?
ive just always felt that dry kits were just better for something you can bolt on in a few hours and snatch back off if you needed to, but if it was something you were wanting to fine tune and build the most out of the setup, you run a wet kit.
__________________
![]() 1995 RMW, K&N FIPK2, Thrush Weldeds, Cragar Soft 8's.. ...soon to be geared and juiced. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
No prob...
But the pic in my sig is an old pic.... Here is a recent ![]()
__________________
![]() One NaSSty Black a.s.s car |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
just kiddin' man, looks nice! what plate is that?
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|