Impala SS Forum

Go Back   Impala SS Forum > Power Adders > N2O
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar vBClassifiedGooglemap ME Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2009, 03:51 PM
TyeStick TyeStick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland, OR.
Posts: 261
TyeStick
Arrow Can't decide between WET or DRY? (Click here)

Here's a superchevy article with a ZEX dry kit, on a 1996 Caprice. They also explained why they chose using a DRY kit over a WET kit.

http://superchevy.automotive.com/658...kit/index.html
__________________
1995 9c1

Performance Mods:
K&N Gen II Intake, TransGo Shift Kit, Exhaust...

Misc Mods:
Autometer Guages, Harness Bar, 5 point harness
-Put Up, Or Shut Up-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2009, 08:59 PM
Midlifecrisis Midlifecrisis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 202
Midlifecrisis is on a distinguished road
Default

awesome.. this will be my christmas present to myself.
__________________



1995 RMW, K&N FIPK2, Thrush Weldeds, Cragar Soft 8's..
...soon to be geared and juiced.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2009, 10:12 PM
SSee SSpot Run's Avatar
SSee SSpot Run SSee SSpot Run is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: spanking shane , n.c.
Posts: 1,863
SSee SSpot Run is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

that they didn't even discuss the merits of the wet kit or even one other manufacturer makes me wonder how much advertising holley brands does with the magazine.
__________________
rock on, rus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loon-Aid Time View Post
The white man never sleeps.... Just kidding, you guys are awsome!
'95 SS 11.72 @ 115 mph
11/08/08 SSHS8 / 4403 lb.s
Hotlanta Dragway
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:35 AM
wilkin4 wilkin4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,194
wilkin4
Default

On an older car like ours, using a wet nitrous system that injects both gasoline and nitrous simultaneously into the intake manifold can prove to be dicey. This is because all the fuel being injected can sit in the manifold and cylinder head's ports and get absorbed into the oil sludge and carbon buildup like a sponge, making it a bomb in the event of a slight backfire. All that fuel wants to combust, and it will rip apart expensive hard parts in the process. Therefore, a dry kit is the safer, more preferred choice for our Killer Whale.

Guess they said older cars with lots of sludge in the intake is the main reason they didn't go wet.
__________________
Friends don't let friends go un-modded.
Bob Wilkinson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2009, 09:03 PM
Rod HarriSS Rod HarriSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Kyle, Tx
Posts: 821
Rod HarriSS
Default

Dry has its advantages and disadvantages....Wet has its advantages and its disadvatages, both systems work if done properly and the engine..especially the bottom end is healthy, both kits yied similar results up to about 125 hp shot...anything after that..a wet system would most likely be better...I have had both on my car..Dry kit for about 6 months and a wet system for the next 5 years after that.

Take a look at the ET page...see how many cars (fast ones) are running dry kits..to how many are running wet kits...that magazine is NOT your friend the issue has been chewed on in detail several times..a lot of that info is now gone..but take a look at the ET page...see which cars have nitrous on them that have similar mods that you have...and see which type of kits they are running...you probably wont see very many dry kits being used.

Peace
__________________


One NaSSty Black a.s.s car

Last edited by Rod HarriSS : 09-30-2009 at 09:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2009, 03:02 PM
Midlifecrisis Midlifecrisis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 202
Midlifecrisis is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod HarriSS View Post
Dry has its advantages and disadvantages....Wet has its advantages and its disadvatages, both systems work if done properly and the engine..especially the bottom end is healthy, both kits yied similar results up to about 125 hp shot...anything after that..a wet system would most likely be better...I have had both on my car..Dry kit for about 6 months and a wet system for the next 5 years after that.

Take a look at the ET page...see how many cars (fast ones) are running dry kits..to how many are running wet kits...that magazine is NOT your friend the issue has been chewed on in detail several times..a lot of that info is now gone..but take a look at the ET page...see which cars have nitrous on them that have similar mods that you have...and see which type of kits they are running...you probably wont see very many dry kits being used.

Peace
ive run dry kits in the past, and for basically stock cars, they rock. not many of us trying to make the decision are trying to build "fast" cars, just trying to make our mostly stock cars "quick". And in that case, dry kits are fantastic, especially ZEX kits.
__________________



1995 RMW, K&N FIPK2, Thrush Weldeds, Cragar Soft 8's..
...soon to be geared and juiced.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2009, 03:27 PM
Rod HarriSS Rod HarriSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Kyle, Tx
Posts: 821
Rod HarriSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midlifecrisis View Post
ive run dry kits in the past, and for basically stock cars, they rock. not many of us trying to make the decision are trying to build "fast" cars, just trying to make our mostly stock cars "quick". And in that case, dry kits are fantastic, especially ZEX kits.
Thanks for clearing that up
__________________


One NaSSty Black a.s.s car
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-21-2009, 04:32 PM
Midlifecrisis Midlifecrisis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 202
Midlifecrisis is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod HarriSS View Post
Thanks for clearing that up
i dunno if that was sarcasm, haha. that setup you have looks nasty! anymore pics of it?

ive just always felt that dry kits were just better for something you can bolt on in a few hours and snatch back off if you needed to, but if it was something you were wanting to fine tune and build the most out of the setup, you run a wet kit.
__________________



1995 RMW, K&N FIPK2, Thrush Weldeds, Cragar Soft 8's..
...soon to be geared and juiced.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2009, 04:51 PM
Rod HarriSS Rod HarriSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Kyle, Tx
Posts: 821
Rod HarriSS
Default

No prob...

But the pic in my sig is an old pic....

Here is a recent
__________________


One NaSSty Black a.s.s car
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2009, 11:38 AM
stills's Avatar
stills stills is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: statesboro
Posts: 508
stills
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod HarriSS View Post
No prob...

But the pic in my sig is an old pic....

Here is a recent
...tsk...

just kiddin' man, looks nice! what plate is that?
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) 2007 Impala SS Forum