Chevy Impala SS Forum banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hey guys, im Nate.

This past January I traded in my 2018 Civic SI on my dream car, a 1994 Impala SS. She's got no rust, and had 53k miles on the dash, now 55k.

Why would anyone trade a new, fuel efficient sports car in on an old 90s v8 boat a lot of people ask me. Well, thats simple. The 7th gen Impala SS is the car that made me into a car guy.

When I was somewhere around 3rd grade, (2002 to 2003) my grandma and I went to the local DQ for an icecream cone. I was standing there enjoying my vanilla icecream when I heard a rumble coming down the road. When I looked, it was an Impala SS. Now I didnt know what it was, but it was the coolest dang thing I had ever seen at tha point, and id often fantasize about having one. I never forgot that car, or how it awoke my love for cars, and with the price of them soaring up over the past few years, I figured id never get one. You see, my chosen career path working on the ambulance as an EMT simply doesnt pay well. So when the crazy car prices hit and the dealer absolutely had to have my SI, I jumped all over the opportunity to negotiate for a great deal on the 94 Impala SS they had sitting in a warehouse.

Its been a total blast owning it this past summer, taking my wife and kids to several carshows. Im so glad I decided to make the trade, it was worth every cent :)

Wheel Tire Car Land vehicle Automotive side marker light


Wheel Car Tire Vehicle Land vehicle


Car Hood Motor vehicle Automotive design Vehicle


Head Car Vehicle Head restraint Window
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Theres a lot id like to do, but asside from a trans build so it doesnt die on me, im going to keep it stock. They are worth most in that configuration.

Well, that and removing the mufflers but keeping the res. I want a nice rumble.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
3.08, GM's typical copout response to '90s CAFE MpG tests that were anachronistic in the 70s.The biggest bang for your buck mod for Fleetwoods, RoadMasters, and Caprices, including your Impala SS, has always been and always will be either:
3.42 if you want to avoid driveshaft vibes and do lots of mostly highway driving
3.42 has a proven track record of statistically irrelevant highway MpG penalties
or
3.73 if you are ready to upgrade your driveshaft and do more city / metro / urban driving
3.73 has a proven track record of improving city / metro / urban MpG about as much as it costs highway MpG:
1-3MpG, depending on the driver and the qualiy of the pcm tune

Feel free to disagree, but 1Slammed96SS knows what he's recommending.
The ISSF has 13 years of collectively repeated and documented experiences which substantiate the above.
If not for the Great Data Mismanagement of Aug 2009, it'd be 21 years instead of 13.

If you are ever lucky enough to dare to test drive a B- or D-car with 3.42, you'll see for yourself:
More assertive gearing impacts drivability quite favorably.
Otherwise GM would not have used 3.42 for the Fleetwood 7000lb tow package (V4P).
I wont disagree with you. Im a total novice mechanic whos experience is in building gokarts and working on bikes. Ive only recently been slowly working on my own cars because mechanics prices are insane. I was under the impression that MPG would drop a lot more than that. If 3.73 looses that little, well thats no different than just driving it a smidge harder than normal.

So if I swap gears, would it have an impact on the life of the trans? Ive been told many a horror storry surrounding the B body and the 4l60e. Heck my mechanics 94 caprice just shat the bed. He said theres plastic discs in the trans, and they broke. I have no idea what he means, its just got me worried to break my SS, as itll take me a LONG time to save up for a replacment
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top