Chevy Impala SS Forum banner
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
G

·
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
i was in the shop yesterday when a guy brought in a beautiful 1995 vette. we had it up in the air and some how he had managed to crach the diff. housing. anyway i was looking at how the independant rear was set up and i was curious if anyone on here may have tried to transplant the vette independant into a 9C1 or impala. it seems like with alittle modifaction it could work. maybe help the boat handle even better. just a thought.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Just for a little perspective: Look at the new GTO, similal weight distribution as a B-body. IRS and Motor Trend shows 8.0G on the skidpad, 63.5 in the slalom. 94 Impala SS had similar numbers. Solid rear axle Camaro SS pulled harder on the skidpad with inferior Goodyear F1's. All are about 55/45 weight distribution. Not that MT is any kind of authoritive source but it is comparing cars with similar procedures from 94 to 04. Or consider similar tests of Jaguars $80,000+ Vanden Plas and XKR; 59mph for the VP,63 mph for the XKR, in the slalom. Both with IRS. Certainly true that these numbers are not the whole story of how a car handles. Or a 03 Cobra with IRS at 65 mph slalom VS a 01 Bullitt with solid rear axle at 63.5 mph slalom. Lots of variables in even these few examples but it should illuminate the point that IRS is not some panacea. FWIW I've seen and driven a privately owned tubular frame, center drive truck arm car at the Silver State Classic. Fabulous transient handling, documented at over 1.1G lateral acceleration,very street livable car, all with a solid rear axle.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top