Ok... now we're getting somewhere. It's obvious you have formed an opinion about Rick M. and his management style. So, I'd like to ask how you formed this opinion? Have you worked with the man? Have you attended any meeting with him? It kind of sounds like you're being feed information.
It's funny that I heard some of the same complaints when Harvey was Pres. He was too pushy, too heavy handed, didn't like his style... blah, blah, blah. I just don't get it.... we all handle things differently; it's the intention that's important.
Do you think Rick has intentions that are not for the good of the club? If you do then that's important and I want to hear them. If you don't then you're acting/speaking out of emotion instead of logic. (back to my pi$$ed off chick example again).
You have a nice idea about who else COULD be Pres, but guess what, none of them stepped up and put their name in the hat, including me. Weather you like his style or not, you have to respect Rick for being willing to do the job. It takes a lot of time and effort. And although I like your idea of telling jokes and drinking beer... real work still needs to get done.
This section confuses me a bit. You list a bunch of the current Directors and say that maybe they should take over the driver seat. Then you say you need a BoD that's really enthusiastic. Are you saying that the current Bod isn't??
Who's doing this "sneaking around"??? And what are they trying to do??
Communication is not perfect across a National Club... and the BoD needs to work on that amongst themselves and with the members.
We're gonna just have to keep our eye on the prize if this club is to prosper... all this petty crap will just hold us back.
[ 06-01-2007, 06:15 PM: Message edited by: Rustic ]