Joined
·
3 Posts
Has anyone compared stock upper control arms to QA1? Installed QA1 upper arms? I find it odd that the upper arms for the Impala is the same as the caprice given the Caprice has different springs and rides higher. One would think the bump stops for upper arm travel would be a little different.
I installed a right QA1 upper arm (PN 52718) on my 96 Impala in order to get AC Line clearance. The Clear Image pro headers burned my first AC line and since I have worn holes through 2 bent AC lines with the stock upper arm making contact. Little room with the big headers. The QA1 does not have the cross webbing that is making contact with the AC line, so good with that. But I noticed the QA1 upper arm would not drop down as low as the stock arm and forced me to jack the car up high from the lower arm to get the castle nut and pin in place. So first sign of an issue. Next after the car was lowered I checked for clearance with 4 wheels in contact and no jack. Stock driver side has about 1.0" more travel available than the QA1 arm (at the bump stop location). I placed a socket 1.5" tall there for reference. Projecting that distance out to the wheel mounting hub, that may be a 2-2.5" difference in wheel travel. Finally I ran a tube from the mounting hole to the ball joint base to check for gap to the stopper. The stock arm right arm has space. The QA1 left arm has interference. So the geometry is substantially different for the bump stop location.
I know this limitation will make my suspension max out quickly when the car starts to lift up a little. (loss of upward travel).
I installed a right QA1 upper arm (PN 52718) on my 96 Impala in order to get AC Line clearance. The Clear Image pro headers burned my first AC line and since I have worn holes through 2 bent AC lines with the stock upper arm making contact. Little room with the big headers. The QA1 does not have the cross webbing that is making contact with the AC line, so good with that. But I noticed the QA1 upper arm would not drop down as low as the stock arm and forced me to jack the car up high from the lower arm to get the castle nut and pin in place. So first sign of an issue. Next after the car was lowered I checked for clearance with 4 wheels in contact and no jack. Stock driver side has about 1.0" more travel available than the QA1 arm (at the bump stop location). I placed a socket 1.5" tall there for reference. Projecting that distance out to the wheel mounting hub, that may be a 2-2.5" difference in wheel travel. Finally I ran a tube from the mounting hole to the ball joint base to check for gap to the stopper. The stock arm right arm has space. The QA1 left arm has interference. So the geometry is substantially different for the bump stop location.
I know this limitation will make my suspension max out quickly when the car starts to lift up a little. (loss of upward travel).