Autocrossing
The Road course classes were developed with a road course in mind. We have rules like "All braking system modifications are allowed." in the stock class (this includes big brake systems). This is important on a road course as it can be a safety issue, especially on certain tracks. Stock brakes are prone to overheating and failure. However, on an autocross course, big brakes are not used so much as a safety precaution as a means to generate faster lap times. I think autocrossing classes should not follow road course.
The SCCA classes are designed to encompass all vehicles. I am not as familiar with these classes as I need to be to vote for or against this option. Can we do a better job classifying b-body's amongst themselves that SCCA can?
I would lean towards voting for number 1 or 2 (SCCA or Detroit-Dallas 4 classes).
Road Course
Karl asks: "The STOCK class: Will there be any cars out there in the ISSCA world that meet this definition?"
Very good question. The intent of this class is to let people with little or no car modifications to participate against each other. Now that you bring this up, I think you make a good point. It is probably rare to find someone that is interested in cars and racing enough to participate in a road course event but has not modded his/her car. We may not see a lot of people in this category. I agree with Don in that we could alter the rules to allow more modifications in the stock class if it turns out we don't have any stock cars. I don't know of a good way to figure this out short of organizing a few events and see who participates.
For the record, I have a stock tranny, no transgo, and stock air intake! (although I would be in the prepared class due to suspension changes). I am going to have to "hook up" with you drag racers and learn to appreciate engine mods!
As far as the catch can for radiator fluid is concerned, I have to think some more about this. I am going to talk with some folks that are more experienced with this and hope to get some insight.
Mike
The Road course classes were developed with a road course in mind. We have rules like "All braking system modifications are allowed." in the stock class (this includes big brake systems). This is important on a road course as it can be a safety issue, especially on certain tracks. Stock brakes are prone to overheating and failure. However, on an autocross course, big brakes are not used so much as a safety precaution as a means to generate faster lap times. I think autocrossing classes should not follow road course.
The SCCA classes are designed to encompass all vehicles. I am not as familiar with these classes as I need to be to vote for or against this option. Can we do a better job classifying b-body's amongst themselves that SCCA can?
I would lean towards voting for number 1 or 2 (SCCA or Detroit-Dallas 4 classes).
Road Course
Karl asks: "The STOCK class: Will there be any cars out there in the ISSCA world that meet this definition?"
Very good question. The intent of this class is to let people with little or no car modifications to participate against each other. Now that you bring this up, I think you make a good point. It is probably rare to find someone that is interested in cars and racing enough to participate in a road course event but has not modded his/her car. We may not see a lot of people in this category. I agree with Don in that we could alter the rules to allow more modifications in the stock class if it turns out we don't have any stock cars. I don't know of a good way to figure this out short of organizing a few events and see who participates.
For the record, I have a stock tranny, no transgo, and stock air intake! (although I would be in the prepared class due to suspension changes). I am going to have to "hook up" with you drag racers and learn to appreciate engine mods!
As far as the catch can for radiator fluid is concerned, I have to think some more about this. I am going to talk with some folks that are more experienced with this and hope to get some insight.
Mike