B-Body Performance.com New Springs & Shocks *Need Input* - Chevy Impala SS Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 09-22-2004, 06:43 PM
SSmokybear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

B-Body Performance.com New Springs & Shocks *need input*

Ok as many of you know we are making our own springs set to release very soon. We have just a little more R&D needed. But this is where you get to give me some input on what you expect from a good performance street & high performance set of springs. I ask that both sedan and wagon owners get in on this conversation.

I would like your input to surround the Hotchkis springs. If you have a set what would you do to improve them? Please be as technical as possible. I need input from the street driving and input from your track experience.

In addition we will be making our own set of shocks that will be R&D around the new springs. I would like those of you with the Bilstein shocks to give me your input on making those dampeners better. Again please be as technical as possible.

After we finish the R&D for the shocks and springs we will finish the R&D for the sway bars. Again for both the sedan and wagon. But that is another conversation we will be having soon. The more input the better.
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 09-22-2004, 08:24 PM
uncle hulka
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Well, Tom, I can give you some details
about my car...
I have the Hotchkis springs. I like the
ride, I feel it's firm and controlled.
I'd like them a little more if they
were more progressive, slightly softer
in the first, say, 1.5" of travel. May
stop me from spilling coffee on my groin
on these so-called roads.
I also have the "stiff" Bilstien shocks,
IMHO the single biggest improvement on the
car handling-wise. These were installed
before the springs BTW. I don't see a lot
room for improvement, honestly, except
I don't like the color... possibly if I
had some control of rebound\compression
dampening, like Koni.
And finally, my sways, I have the HO front
and rear. I feel the car STILL leans too
much, even with the 1.75" rear bar. I know
they're working, as I've torn the front
mounts out of the frame already. I had to
fab some spacers for the rear bar as it was
rubbing the Hotchkis LCA's and creating a
squeak that'd crack glass. Still, a huge
improvement over stock.
My 9C1 is about 99% street driven, just ran
a couple of auto-X's last summer.
HTH!
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 09-22-2004, 08:34 PM
bengston
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I like the stock height, but I'd guess that a lower stock linear rate rear spring, in conjuction with something along the lines of the GW linear rate spring, to match a lower rear, would be pretty impressive. When I get around to it, the GW fronts will be what I go with, retaining the stock rears.

uncle hulka, I've heard of stiffer bars than the HAs, but they require frame reinforcement, and maximum roll control does not necessarily mean best handling.
 
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 09-22-2004, 08:43 PM
uncle hulka
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
uncle hulka, I've heard of stiffer bars than the HAs, but they require frame reinforcement, and maximum roll control does not necessarrilly mean best handling.
I agree, Wayne. This IS a daily driver.
I was considering reinforcing the frame,
specifically the boxed area at the rear,
I've seen posts about cracking in this area.
I guess I'm old school... You know, any kind
of suspension will work as long as you don't
let it work.
I was simply expecting a much bigger
improvement. I will say the car is very
"planted" now, and also lateral bumps
don't upset it in the least. Couldn't say
that about stock.
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 09-22-2004, 09:16 PM
DREAMS
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Hey guys,
to be honest, i have none of the parts you are talking about, although i need all 3 and will be buying them shortly.

I was leaning towards to Hotchkis myself, but i really wanted them to be a tad lower than what they drop the car now. I was undecided between them and the Intrax, so i didn't buy eaither yet (as shown in a thread in the suspension section)
I also felt that the Intrax may be a little to low, i was also told with the X pipe and Spintechs, i might be a tad bit to low for them.
So you seem like an excellent candidate for my new springs and shocks if all goes well !!

I will be putting new mags/tires on shortly. This combo will give me a 26" total hight. The Hotchkis i think would be high still. Basically, i would love a spring set that would a) lower the car lower than the Hotchkis, but just a "tad" higher than the Intrax, b) keep a leveled look to the car and remove the "raked look" from the car, like the Intrax do. I also like a "stiffer" styled spring, although not to stiff, i hate the bounce i get on the highway or street. Progressive would be nice (i think i have understood what that means...) I love to feel the road when i drive, that "controlled" and "firm" feel is great, i don't like the "floating" feeling. I hope Tom that this could be 2 points to consider (the lowering and non raked finish) This is key to my next set, i need them, hopefully i can buy them from you. I'll let you know if anything else comes to mind.

As for shocks, again, stiff is nice. I have a sh*t pair of broken shocks on the car right now, time for a major upgrade. I have read allot on the Severe Service from Monroe sounded intersting, although the stiff Bilstein have been runner up in the buy. I have read about both, yet don't know the difference between them, but they say the stiff series from Bilstein is great, i would assume they are more expensive than most shocks though. Something with no to much bounce would be good, again, i love to feel the road.

Sways would be a nice mod for me, no feedback to give though, sorry. Keep us posted with any news and progress on all 3 items..i need 2 of them for sure!!

Tony
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 09-23-2004, 07:37 AM
Don2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I say go for a higher spring rates than the Hotchkis (which I currently have). They actually ride quite nice. The stance is just about perfect. Any lower and I would not have much of my TCI trans pan left. With the appropriate dampener, the stiffer springs should not be a problem. To improve on the shocks, I would make something with separate rebound and compression adjustments...the QA1 downfall. A coil over option would be nice. Then you could have the option of changing spring install heights, spring rates, and adjust the weight balance of the car a little easier. The tubular a-arms should allow you to implement this.
For sway bars, something adjustable with the capability of the HO bars, but lighter. Perhaps a little more ground clearance for the back bar.
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Chevy Impala SS Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome